Legal Opinion

Fitzsimmons v. Rauch

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 22, 1945No. 31264PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBayless, J.

Mamie C. Fitzsimmons, claiming to be the owner, and George A. Fitzsimmons, her former husband, and W. Combs Hughes, claiming to be a mortgage holder on the property involved, instituted an action in the district court of Oklahoma county against L. M. Rauch, who had applied for a tax deed on the property, and Wm. F. Vahlberg, county treasurer, for an injunction against the issuance of said tax deed and for other relief, and appeal from a judgment adverse to them. The trial court denied the application for temporary injunction. The tax deed was issued. Thereafter the pleadings joined issue on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Bristow Ex Rel. Hedges v. GroomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  2. Pierce Oil Corp. v. Phoenix Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. McGrath v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Board of Education of Duncan v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Board of Com'rs of Custer County v. City of ClintonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Nielson v. City of GoodingIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  2. State Ex Rel. Nielson v. City of GoodingIdaho Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API