Wells County Water Resource District v. Solberg
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MESCHKE, Justice.
We hold that an order upholding the public necessity of taking flowage ease- merits in a condemnation suit is not final and, therefore, not appealable without NDRCivP 54(b) action by the trial court. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.
Since 1979, the Wells County Water Resource District has been developing the Heimdal Drain Project. In Larson v. Wells County Water Resource Board, 385 N.W.2d 480 (N.D.1986), we affirmed the decision of the District’s Board approving a drain permit for the Project. Later, we held that the District could not use the “quick take” provisions of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gast Construction Co. v. Brighton PartnershipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Matter of Estate of StuckleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Regstad v. SteffesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Johnson v. Wells County Water Resource BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Sargent County Bank v. WentworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brunsoman v. ScarlettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Ceartin v. OchsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Gissel v. Kenmare TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Central Power Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. C-K, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Barth v. SchmidtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.