Brunsoman v. Scarlett
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINE, Justice.
Robert K. Scarlett appeals from a partial summary judgment declaring that Scarlett owed Willard C. Brunsoman, Jr., $203,-291.40 on a contract for deed and ordering a jury trial to determine the fair value of the subject property for purposes of applying the provisions of the anti-deficiency judgment law. Following a jury trial, judgment was entered awarding Brunsoman a deficiency judgment of $56,825.56. The questions before us are whether procedural protections of the anti-deficiency judgment statutes may be waived by a mortgagor or vendee after default, and if so, whether…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Freedland v. GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- First National Bank of Crosby v. BjorgenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. ManningNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- Olson v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Salter v. UlrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Steckler v. StecklerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- First Interstate Bank of Fargo, N.A. v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Center for Special Needs Trust Administration, Inc. v. OlsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- LaSalle Bank National Ass'n v. SleutelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Bennett Blum, M.D., Inc. v. Cowan Law Office of Rand HaddockCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.