Legal Opinion

Gissel v. Kenmare Township

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1990No. Civ. 900293, 900294PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

Curtis and Joan Gissel appeal from a district court order which dismissed a part of their appeal from Kenmare Township’s decision to discontinue a township road, dissolved an injunction restraining Ken-mare Township from discontinuing the road, and provided that “the parties may proceed as provided by law with a jury trial to establish damages, if any, to the [Gis-sels] from the closure of said road.” Because the jury determination of damages remains pending and no order complying with Rule 54(b), N.D.R.Civ.P., was entered, we dismiss the appeal.

To facilitate the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Donald R. Huene and Annette S. Huene v. United States of America and Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Peterson v. ZerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. In Re Massachusetts Helicopter Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
  4. Raymond F. Ringwald, Sr. v. R. D. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  5. Gast Construction Co. v. Brighton PartnershipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. B.H. v. K.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Gissel v. Kenmare TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Central Power Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. C-K, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Gissel v. Kenmare TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Holverson v. LundbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API