Legal Opinion

Matter of Estate of Stuckle

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1988No. Civ. 870375PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIERKE, Justice.

Marion Stuckle appeals from county court judgments denying several of her claims in probate against the estate of her husband, Daniel Stuckle. We dismiss the appeal.

The requirements of Rule 54(b), N.D.R. Civ.P., are fully applicable in probate proceedings. Matter of Estate of Erickson, 368 N.W.2d 525, 528 (N.D.1985). In Matter of Estate of Sorensen, 406 N.W.2d 365 (N.D.1987), we said:

“Under North Dakota Century Code § 30.1-02-06.1 [U.P.C. 1-308], the right to appellate review of probate orders is governed by the rules applicable to appeals to the Supreme Court in equity cases…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gillan v. SaffellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. First Trust Co. of North Dakota v. ConwayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Matter of Estate of EricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Matter of Estate of SorensenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Peterson v. ZerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Investors Title Insurance Co. v. HerzigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  4. McLean v. Kirby Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Matter of Estate of StarcherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API