Legal Opinion
Suttenfield v. Travelers Indemnity Company
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided August 25, 1955No. Civ. A. 1912PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHEEHY, Chief Judge.
James E. Suttenfield, a citizen of Virginia, and Columbus Fiber Mills Company, Inc., a Georgia corporation which will be hereinafter referred to as Columbus, as Plaintiffs, are seeking to recover moneys they were compelled to pay and expend in the defense and settlement of a certain law suit brought by one Edgar E. Hoppe against the Plaintiffs, wherein Hoppe was seeking to recover damages in a substantial amount he claimed to have suffered as a result of an automobile collision between an automobile operated by Hoppe' and an automobile operated by Suttenfield.
The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Southern Travelers' Ass'n v. WrightTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Vern v. Merchants Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1952
- Penn v. National Union Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- Aetna Life Insurance v. ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Main Investment Co. v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
3Cited by5 opinions
- Leteff v. Maryland Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
- Nelson v. United States Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Continental Casualty Co. v. SuttenfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Sentry Security Systems, Inc v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Continental Casualty Company v. James E. Suttenfield and Columbus Fiber Mills Company, Inc., James E. Suttenfield and Columbus Fiber Mills Company, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956