Legal Opinion
Continental Casualty Company v. James E. Suttenfield and Columbus Fiber Mills Company, Inc., James E. Suttenfield and Columbus Fiber Mills Company, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided October 4, 1956No. 15873Published
1Opinion of the Court
236 F.2d 433
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
James E. SUTTENFIELD and Columbus Fiber Mills Company, Inc.,
Appellees.
James E. SUTTENFIELD and Columbus Fiber Mills Company, Inc.,
Appellants,
v.
TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 15873.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 6, 1956.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 4, 1956.
Otis B. Gary, D. L. Case, Robertson, Jackson, Payne, Lancaster & Walker, J. L. Lancaster, Jr., Dallas, Tex., for appellant, Continental Cas. Co.
Ernest E. Specks, W. C. Gowan, Carrington, Gowan, Johnson, Bromberg & Leeds, Dallas, Tex., for appellants James E.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Aler v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1950
- Continental Cas. Co. v. WeekesSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Pacific Automobile Insurance v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MarrDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1955
- Campbell v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.