Legal Opinion

Sentry Security Systems, Inc v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1975No. Docket 56411PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion. The factual background for this case is reported at 56 Mich App 182; 223 NW2d 708 (1974). We grant leave to appeal and peremptorily, under GCR 1963, 865.1(7), reverse the Court of Appeals and remand to the trial court for the entry of a judgment declaring that the policy of insurance issued by the defendant company does not provide non-owned automobile insurance coverage to a corporate named insured.

Under the policy of insurance, liability coverage with respect to non-owned automobiles applies as to the "named insured” only if he is an "individual”.

The plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Suttenfield v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1955
  2. Sentry Security Systems, Inc. v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Auto-Owners Insurance v. HarveyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. City of Ypsilanti v. Appalachian InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
  3. Hertz Corp. v. AshbaughNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. CookCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
  5. School District for the City of Royal Oak v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API