Legal Opinion

Milton v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 13, 1913PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Quo warranto. Before Judge Parker.. Pierce superior court. September 21, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtFish, C. J.

This was an information in the nature of quo warranto brought by Robert 6. Mitchell Jr., claiming the office of judge of the city court of Blackshear, against Walter A. Milton, to inquire into the right of the latter to such office. Mitchell’s petition set forth that he claimed to be the duly appointed, qualified, and commissioned judge of that court, “and as such applies for leave to file in behalf of himself the accompanying information in the nature of a quo warranto, in order that he may inquire into the right of respondent W. A. Milton, therein named, to hold the office of judge and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Capital City Water Co. v. State ex rel. MacdonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. City of East Dallas v. State ex rel. PutzTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Jones v. State ex rel. SnodgrassIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. District Attorney v. KistlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  5. McWilliams v. JacobsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sweat v. BarnhillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  2. Stanley v. SimsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Anderson v. FlakeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  4. Culbreth v. CannadySupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  5. Overton v. GandySupreme Court of Georgia · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API