Legal Opinion

City of East Dallas v. State ex rel. Putz

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1889No. 2628PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Dallas. Tried below before Hon. G. 1ST. Aldredge.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaines, Associate Justice.—

This is a proceeding in the nature of a quo warranto, instituted in the name of the State of Texas upon the relation of Joseph Putz, to determine the question of the validity of an election by which it was sought to enlarge the limits of the city of East Dallas. The District Court upon a final hearing held the territory sought to be annexed not a part of the city, and the respondents appealed.

We will dispose of the questions necessary to determine the appeal without reference to the order of the assignments of error.

It is insisted that the District Court had no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hoya v. DunsonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. State v. De GressTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Buford v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Paris Grocer Co. v. W.H. BurksTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  2. State ex rel. Taylor v. EidsonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. State ex inf. Crow v. FlemingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  4. Little v. State ex rel. ParsellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1890
  5. Ex Parte FlakeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API