Legal Opinion

McWilliams v. Jacobs

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 16, 1907PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Quo warranto. Before Judge Worrill. Bandolph superior court. January 31, 1907.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

The defendants in error moved to dismiss the bill of ■exceptions, (1) because there was no notice given them of the application for leave to file the information in the nature of a writ of quo warranto, and they were not parties to the application; and (2) because there is no case pending against them as to the matters alleged in the petition for leave to file the application, and they can not be made parties to a bill of’exceptions in a case in which they were never sued or served, and from the judgment* or decision in which they could not themselves have had a writ of error, or filed’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Hathcock v. McGouirkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. State v. Southwestern RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  4. Harris v. PoundsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sweat v. BarnhillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  2. Milton v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. Shaw v. DeVaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  4. Walker v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  5. Cloud v. County of TaliaferroSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API