Legal Opinion

Sweat v. Barnhill

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 3, 1930No. Nos. 7548, 7584PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. In a quo warranto proceeding instituted under the Civil Code, § 5451, where an issue of fact is raised by the respondent as provided in § 5453, “the judge shall forthwith” draw a jury and fix a day for the trial of the ease, which “ shall not be less than ten nor longer than thirty days,” the judge having a discretion “to continue the hearing from day to day,” and, whether begun in term time or vacation, the judge shall “so order all the proceedings connected with and usual in such cases that the final determination shall be had by him in ten days from the commencement of such” proceeding.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Cox v. StricklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Moore v. Kelly & Jones Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Edwards v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  4. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. LasseterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Hulgan v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  2. Butler v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  3. Lucas v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  4. Pierce v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  5. Smith v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API