Legal Opinion

State Farm General Insurance v. Frake

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 2011No. B223865PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*571Opinion

ZELON, J.

INTRODUCTION

After consuming several beers, respondent Patrick Frake struck his friend, respondent John King, in the groin, causing significant injuries. King filed a complaint against Frake for negligence, assault and battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Frake tendered the case to appellant State Farm General Insurance Company under a renter’s policy that provided coverage for bodily injury “caused by an occurrence,” which the policy defined as “an accident.” Frake told State Farm he struck King as part of a consensual game and that he did not intend to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Geddes & Smith, Inc. v. Saint Paul Mercuy Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Merced Mutual Insurance v. MendezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Albert v. Mid-Century Ins. CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. North Counties Engineering, Inc. v. State Farm General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Traveler's Prop. Cas. Co. of Am. v. Actavis, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Navigators Specialty Insurance Co. v. Moorefield Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Francis v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API