Legal Opinion

Holman v. Hudson

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1940No. 33772PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, O. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

In 1926, P. B. Worthy, J. J. Pearson, and J. E. Hudson executed a written agreement guaranteeing the payment to W. T. Bawleigh Company of merchandise to be sold by it to Wilbur K. Bennett. The Bawleigh Company sued on this guaranty and obtained a joint judgment of $300 against the guarantors. This judgment was collected by the Bawleigh Company from Pludson, who then instituted a suit in equity against Worthy for the recovery of one-third thereof. He also alleged that Worthy had fraudulently conveyed all of his property to the appellant, his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Willis v. GattmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
  2. McLean v. LetchfordMississippi Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Haggett v. JonesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1913

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. BLOUNT v. BlountMississippi Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Dufresne v. Regency Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Dehmer v. TempleDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1984
  4. Patterson ex rel. Patterson v. AdamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Mississippi Cottonseed Products Co. v. PhelpsMississippi Supreme Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API