Legal Opinion

Miller v. Murphy

California Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1921No. S. F. No. 9176PublishedCited by 20 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.

This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment and decree of foreclosure in favor of plaintiff to enforce the terms of a written contract and lien.

Plaintiff’s cause of action arose upon a written agreement, executed by defendants, whereby they jointly and severally contracted to repay to plaintiff money to be advanced by the latter for taxes accrued and accruing on certain parcels of land then in litigation between the parties, in the event that defendants should be adjudged the owners of the land, and creating a lien on the land as security for such advances.

That litigation resulted in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. McBride v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Baker v. Eilers Music Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Lehmann v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Roberts v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Colvig v. RKO General, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Taylor v. GeorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Jones v. Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Whittier v. VisscherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. F.People v. MonierCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API