Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Bank of Newbury

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 11, 1864PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

68 U.S. 234 (1863)

1 Wall. 234

BALDWIN

v.

BANK OF NEWBURY.

Supreme Court of United States.

Mr. F.A. Brooks, for Baldwin, the plaintiff in error.

Mr. Hutchins, contra.

Mr. Justice CLIFFORD, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court:

1. Two questions are presented for decision, but the first is the same as that just decided in the preceding case, and for the reasons there given must be determined in the same way. Contrary to what was held in the case of Scribner et al. v. Fisher, 2 Gray, 43, we hold that the certificate of discharge in the case was no bar to the action, because the debt…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Mechanics' Bank v. Bank of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  3. Long v. ColburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  4. Watervliet Bank v. WhiteCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  5. Rutland & Burlington R. R. v. ColeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1851

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Butler v. GoreleySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Butler v. KaulbackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  3. Griffin v. ErskineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. First National Bank v. McCulloughOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Second National Bank v. Midland Steel Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1900

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API