Legal Opinion

Fickett v. Higginbotham-Bailey-Logan Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 29, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLydon, J.

The action is against a foreign corporation for goods sold and delivered. Defendant, appearing specially, moved on affidavits to vacate the service of process on the ground that the court had not obtained jurisdiction of its person. The motion was denied. An appeal was taken from that order but has not been prosecuted.

*19Defendant then answered, pleading first, the facts which, as it claimed, showed the court to be without jurisdiction of its person. Under protest expressed in the answer it then pleaded to the merits. On the trial it participated not only by offering proof on the jurisdictional…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Harkness v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Jones v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Henderson v. HendersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Greenberg v. Lamson Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947
  2. Meinhard, Greeff & Co. v. Higginbotham-Bailey-Logan Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  3. Dalinda v. AbeggNew York Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API