Legal Opinion

Dalinda v. Abegg

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1941PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalter, J.

Defendant, a non-resident, moves to vacate an order for service of the summons by publication and a warrant of attachment, and all proceedings taken thereunder, upon the grounds (a) that the warrant was not levied upon any property of defendant, and (b) the papers upon which the order for service by publication was made contained no proof by affidavit that the warrant had been so levied. The property claimed to have been levied upon consists of stock certificates of which defendant appears by the certificates to be the owner and which were and are held by J. P. Morgan & Co. in custodian…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Toledo Railways & Light Co. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Dimmerling v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. David S. Stern Corp. v. SilvermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  4. Norton v. CromwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  5. Fickett v. Higginbotham-Bailey-Logan Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Standard Foods Products Corp. v. Vinas Unidas S. ANew York Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Dalinba v. AbeggAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  3. Barron v. Winchester Broadcasting Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Mandl v. MandlNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Shulock v. ScottNew York Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API