Legal Opinion
Henderson v. Henderson
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 27, 1928PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.
The parties were married and for several years resided together in this State. Plaintiff still lives here. Defendant became a resident of Pennsylvania and in that State was personally served in an action brought in New York for absolute divorce. Upon his default in pleading, plaintiff moved for judgment, the Special Term heard testimony some of which was elicited by defendant’s attorney who was present at the hearing, issued an order allowing counsel fees, made findings of fact and conclusions of law and granted an interlocutory decree of divorce with alimony. After the entry of that judgment…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. McBrideSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Merchants Heat & Light Co. v. J. B. Clow & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Thames & Mersey Marine Insurance v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States Ex Rel. International Contracting Co. v. LamontSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Reed v. . ChilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Gager v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Taveras v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Marcus v. OtisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Gomez v. GomezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Braman v. BramanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.