Legal Opinion

Christensen v. Lightbourne

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided October 6, 2017No. A144254PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

*1243This appeal presents a narrow question about what counts as family income when determining a family's eligibility for cash aid under the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids Act (CalWORKs) program. ( Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 11200 et seq. )1

Here, a CalWORKs applicant, Angie Christensen, lives with her husband and her children. Her husband is the noncustodial parent of additional children, and court-ordered child support is garnished from his income for the benefit of these children who do not live in the applicant's home. Counting the garnished amounts as nonexempt income to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Heckler v. TurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Frink v. ProdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Sara M. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Sharon S. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Christensen v. LightbourneCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Abney v. State Dept. of Health Care ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  3. Barber Group, Inc. v. New Motor Vehicle Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2023
  4. Cruz v. City of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  5. In re OliverasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API