Connerly v. State Personnel Board
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORENO, J.
This case involves litigation over private attorney general fees awarded pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 1 in an action “which has resulted in the enforcement of an important right affecting the public interest . . . .” Here, plaintiff Ward Connerly successfully pursued litigation to invalidate several state statutes as unconstitutional under article I, section 31 of the California Constitution, enacted in 1996 as Proposition 209, which outlawed governmental preferential treatment by race, sex, and other categories. The state agencies that were the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Independent Federation of Flight Attendants v. ZipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Maria P. v. RilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Haraguchi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- North Bay Regional Center v. MaldonadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Mountain Air Enters., LLC v. Sundowner Towers, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Sierra Club v. County of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Collins v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.