Wrightesmith v. Public Utilities Commission

The question here is whether the order of the commission revoking certificate No. 489-1 is unreasonable or unlawful.

An attorney examiner of the commission made an investigation and reported his findings and recommendations. When the cause was before the commission, it adopted the statement of the evidence as found by its attorney examiner, but did not concur with his findings and recommendations. The attorney examiner recommended that the certificate be not disturbed and that the complaint be dismissed.

A brief history of the certificate discloses that it was granted to one Frederick S. Gross…