Bray v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
In order to secure from the Public Utilities Commission an amendment to a contract carrier’s permit so as to take on a new or additional customer, a contract carrier must qualify under and meet the requirements of Sections 614-109 and 614-83, G-eneral Code.
By virtue of these sections, an amended permit shall be granted if the applicant has complied with the law, and the rules and regulations of the commission; is operating as a private motor carrier; is a proper person to receive a permit; and the granting of the permit Avill be “consistent with the declared policy, and purpose, of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McLain v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Pennsylvania Rd. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- H. & K. Motor Transportation, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1939
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mason v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Harold D. Miller, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Columbus-Cincinnati Trucking Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Modern Motor Express, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- Adams v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.