Legal Opinion

Bray v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1942No. 28823PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

In order to secure from the Public Utilities Commission an amendment to a contract carrier’s permit so as to take on a new or additional customer, a contract carrier must qualify under and meet the requirements of Sections 614-109 and 614-83, G-eneral Code.

By virtue of these sections, an amended permit shall be granted if the applicant has complied with the law, and the rules and regulations of the commission; is operating as a private motor carrier; is a proper person to receive a permit; and the granting of the permit Avill be “consistent with the declared policy, and purpose, of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McLain v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Pennsylvania Rd. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  3. H. & K. Motor Transportation, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mason v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Harold D. Miller, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Columbus-Cincinnati Trucking Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Modern Motor Express, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Adams v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API