Legal Opinion
State v. Cuesta
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 26, 2002No. AC 20583PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The defendant, Dagoberto Cuesta, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a juiy trial, of robbery in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-136 (a) and assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 531a-61.1 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) excluded evidence of the presence of a third party’s semen, (2) admitted a uniform arrest report into evidence and (3) found the defendant competent to stand trial. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. EllisonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. SellsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. DupigneyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. GarciaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.