Legal Opinion

WARREN IRRIGATION COMPANY v. Brown

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1972No. 12620PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Chief Justice:

Plaintiff initiated this action to quiet title to a certain water right, hereinafter identified as the Skeen right. In the alternative, plaintiff sought to diminish the quantity of water to be furnished under this right and to increase the cost. Upon trial before the court, a decree was rendered declaring defendants the owners of the right and granting them damages in a sum equal to the rental fees for water that defendants had been compelled to procure as a substitute for the water withheld by plaintiff. Plaintiff appeals therefrom.

In 1903, plaintiff’s remote…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wheadon v. PearsonUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Roosevelt v. Beau Monde Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  3. Cortella v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Gunnison-Fayette Canal Company v. RobertsUtah Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holmgren v. Utah-Idaho Sugar Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Forsgren v. SollieUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Forsgren v. SollieUtah Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API