Legal Opinion

Wheadon v. Pearson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1962No. 9696PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Justice.

In a prior action plaintiffs sought to establish a right of way over the adjoining land of the defendants upon the theory of a prescriptive easement — that plaintiffs and their predecessors had adversely used the alleged right of way for a continuous period in excess of 20 years. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was granted at the pretrial hearing when it was determined that the claimed period of adverse use did not amount to 20 years because for a five year period the adjoining parcels of land had been under the common ownership of the plaintiffs. 1 A motion for a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. East Mill Creek Water Co. v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Madsen v. BorthickUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. MacRis & Associates, Inc. v. Neways, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Penrod v. Nu Creation Creme, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Belliston v. Texaco, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Bradshaw v. KershawUtah Supreme Court · 1981

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API