Gunnison-Fayette Canal Company v. Roberts
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McDonough, justice.
Plaintiff commenced the action below to recover from the defendants their pro rata •share of the expenses for the operation and •maintenance of a canal which the parties •used jointly. The case was tried to the •court without a jury and from an adverse .judgment the defendants appeal.
The plaintiff corporation operates and ^maintains the Gunnison-Fayette Canal ■which diverts water from the Sevier River at a point approximately one and one-half miles northwest of the community of Axtel, Utah, and conveys the water so diverted in a general northerly direction to the east of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cole v. ParkerUtah Supreme Court · 1956
- Minersville Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. Rocky Ford Irr. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1936
- West Union Canal Co. v. ThornleyUtah Supreme Court · 1924
- Peterson v. Sevier Valley Canal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1944
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. Richmond Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Green River Canal Co. v. ThaynUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- Swasey v. Rocky Point Ditch Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
- WARREN IRRIGATION COMPANY v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1972
- Rageth v. Sidon Irrigation DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- Swasey v. Rocky Point Ditch Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.