Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Wall

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 30, 2003No. 2001-258-C.APublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The applicant, Sydney Earl Scott Taylor (Taylor or applicant), appeals from a Superior Court judgment denying his application for post-conviction relief. This case came before the Supreme Court for oral argument on March 3, 2003, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not summarily be decided. After hearing the arguments of counsel and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown and proceed to decide the appeal at this time. For the reasons set forth herein, we…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Sawyer v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Ouimette v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  5. Carillo v. MoranSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by27 opinions

  1. Bustamante v. WallSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  2. Mattatall v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  3. Kyle Campbell v. State of Rhode IslandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  4. Young v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  5. Gordon v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API