Taylor v. Wall
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The applicant, Sydney Earl Scott Taylor (Taylor or applicant), appeals from a Superior Court judgment denying his application for post-conviction relief. This case came before the Supreme Court for oral argument on March 3, 2003, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not summarily be decided. After hearing the arguments of counsel and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown and proceed to decide the appeal at this time. For the reasons set forth herein, we…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Sawyer v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Ouimette v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
- Carillo v. MoranSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by27 opinions
- Bustamante v. WallSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- Mattatall v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- Kyle Campbell v. State of Rhode IslandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
- Young v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- Gordon v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.