Legal Opinion

Sawyer v. Smith

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided August 30, 1990No. 89-5809PublishedCited by 621 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy

We must decide in this case whether a prisoner whose murder conviction became final before our decision in Caldwell v. Mississippi, 472 U. S. 320 (1985), is entitled to use that decision to challenge his capital sentence in a federal habeas corpus action. We hold that he cannot, for Caldwell announced a new rule as defined by Teague v. Lane, 489 U. S. 288 (1989), and the new rule does not come within Teague’s exception for watershed rules fundamental to the integrity of the criminal proceeding.

I

Over 10 years ago, petitioner Robert Sawyer murdered Frances Arwood, a visitor in the New Orleans,…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by621 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Sawyer v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Gray v. NetherlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Ashcroft v. al-KiddSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

616 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API