Legal Opinion

Kyle Campbell v. State of Rhode Island

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 12, 2012No. 2006-98-AppealPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice GOLDBERG,

for the Court.

The applicant, Kyle Campbell (Campbell or applicant), appeals from the Superior Court’s denial of his application for post-conviction relief, alleging, inter alia, that the trial justice erred in failing to appoint counsel before he dismissed Campbell’s claims. Because G.L.1956 § 10-9.1-5 1 mandates that an indigent applicant for posteonviction relief be represented by the Public Defender or appointed counsel, and Campbell was not provided with the appointed counsel to which he was entitled, we vacate the judgment and remand this case to the Superior…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Overstreet v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Shatney v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  5. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. Adrian HazardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
  2. Pedro Reyes v. State of Rhode IslandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016
  3. State v. Steven B. MorrisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014
  4. Epic Enterprises LLC v. The Bard Group, LLCSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2018
  5. Joshua Mello v. Sean KilleavySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2019

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API