Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Irwin

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1923No. Civil No. 2071PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, C. J.

— On September 25, 1919, William Irwin and Anna Irwin, as parties of tbe first part, and W. T. Armstrong and W. M. Scott, as parties of tbe second part, entered into a written contract by wbicb the former agreed to sell and tbe latter to bny, under tbe conditions therein expressed, a quarter-section of land situated in Maricopa county, Arizona, for a consideration of $59,100, to be paid as follows: $6,500 on January 1, 1920, wbicb was evidenced by a promissory note, and $5,000 on or before tbe first day of each January thereafter until January 1, 1930, when tbe final payment of $7,600 would…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Griffith Ex Rel. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Wilcoxson v. StittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Maffet v. Oregon & Cal. RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  4. McKee v. SoherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Jones v. Mississippi Farms Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1917

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Treadway v. Western Cotton Oil & Ginning Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Motorola, Inc. v. Fairchild Camera and Instrument Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 1973
  3. Weatherford v. AdamsArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  4. City of Phoenix v. Com/Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. Dobson Bay Club II DD, LLC v. La Sonrisa De Siena, LLCArizona Supreme Court · 2017

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API