State v. Cyr
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The defendant, Michael Cyr, appeals from the judgment of conviction rendered following his conditional plea of nolo contendere to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 2005) § 14-227a. The plea followed the court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to dismiss. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly denied his motion to dismiss because there was insufficient evidence that he was operating a motor vehicle within the meaning of the statute. We agree with the defendant and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brunetti v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- State v. BrunettiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. SwiftSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- State v. ReveloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. KelleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. CyrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. PalkimasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. ClausenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. CyrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007