Legal Opinion

State v. Clausen

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 3, 2007No. AC 27690PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The defendant, Guy Clausen, appeals from the judgment of conviction following his conditional plea of nolo contendere to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of General Statutes § 14-227a. The plea followed the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to dismiss, which the defendant claims on appeal was improper because he was not operating a motor vehicle at the time of his arrest.1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

In the early morning hours of December 24, 2005, after failing multiple field sobriety tests administered…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. HaightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. State v. DucattConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  3. State v. WiggsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  4. Amesbury v. Dean, Sheriff, Marion County, FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. State v. AngueiraConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. State v. PetersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API