Patent Brick Co. v. Moore
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
—Nine separate actions were instituted in the trial court for the foreclosure of mechanics’ liens against certain property belonging to the Mechanics’ Institute, arising out of a building contract which the institute had entered into with Charles P. Moore et al. Those several actions were by order of court consolidated into one, and tried without a jury.
Judgment of foreclosure in behalf of all the lien claimants was rendered, and from that and an order refusing to grant a motion for a new trial, the Mechanics’ Institute has appealed.
The grounds upon which the motion for a new trial *207pr…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Davis v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Holmes v. RichetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Millard v. HathawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Mulcahy v. GlazierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
- Bottomly v. RectorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
3Cited by22 opinions
- Dyer Bros. I. Wks. v. Central I. Wks.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Pacific Factor Co. v. AdlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Long Beach City School District v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Dyer Bros. Golden W. Iron Works v. Cent. Iron WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Thomas v. AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.