Legal Opinion

Wentz v. Unifi, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1988No. 8726SC551PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Plaintiff, in his first argument contends that because of the factual inconsistencies between the plaintiffs and defendants’ pleadings, the trial court committed error in submitting the issue of contributory negligence to the jury. Relying on Dennis v. VonCannon, 272 N.C. 446, 158 S.E. 2d 489 (1968) and Jackson v. McBride, 270 N.C. 367, 154 S.E. 2d 468 (1967), plaintiff argues that acceptance of the facts which he alleges in his complaint must necessarily preclude the acceptance of facts alleged by defendants in their answers thereby negating defendants’ affirmative defense of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Atkins v. MoyeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Broyhill v. CoppageCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Smith v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Jackson Ex Rel. Jackson v. McBrideSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Keith v. PolierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Nunnery v. BaucomCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Johnson v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. Bosley v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Hinnant v. HollandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API