Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Quality Loan Service Corp.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 22, 2010No. 09-CV-01789 OWW-DLBPublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT

OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Before the court is a motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, a motion for a more definite statement filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA (“Defendant” or “JPMorgan”). 1 The motion is directed at all claims asserted by pro se Plaintiff David E. Jensen (“Plaintiff’) in his First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) for damages, declaratory and injunctive relief. The following background facts are taken from the FAC and other documents…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Jaime Medrano v. Flagstar Bank, FsbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Jolley v. Chase Home Finance, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Slemmer v. McGlaughlin Spray Foam Insulation, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Amina v. WMC Fin. Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2018
  5. Long v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API