Legal Opinion

Benedict v. Key Bank of Alaska

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1996No. S-6743PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHORTELL, Justice Pro Tern.

I. INTRODUCTION

Howard Benedict appeals the superior court’s denial of his Alaska Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion for relief from a default judgment obtained by Key Bank of Alaska. We affirm the trial court’s ruling.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

In 1984, Key Bank loaned a substantial amount of money to a partnership in which Howard Benedict was a general partner. The loan was secured by a deed of trust on real property in Anchorage (property). Benedict also personally guaranteed the promissory note on the loan. The partnership was unable to make payments in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Central Operating Company v. Utility Workers of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
  2. Security Mutual Casualty Company v. Century Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  3. Bauman v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Alaska Placer Company v. LeeAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Kenai Peninsula Borough v. English Bay Village Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sengupta v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Dixon v. PouncyAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Young v. KellyAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Frost v. AyojiakAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Brown v. LangeAlaska Supreme Court · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API