Legal Opinion

Brown v. Lange

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 2001No. S-8745PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Wesley Brown, a formerly pro se defendant, appeals the superior court's denial of his motion to set aside a default judgment against him in a personal injury case. Brown asserts that he was entitled to notice before the entry of the default, that he was entitled to notice before the entry of the default judgment, and that plaintiff Robert Lange's attorney was obliged both to inquire about Brown's intentions and to notify the court of Brown's attempt to contact him before seeking the default. In these matters of first impression, we disagree with Brown:…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. New York Life Insurance v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  3. Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Bauman v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Ford v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Reich v. Cominco Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Snyder v. American Legion Spenard Post No. 28Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Pepper v. Routh Crabtree, APCAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Hicks v. PleasantsAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Brown v. LangeAlaska Supreme Court · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API