Legal Opinion

Dieffenbach v. McIntyre

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 16, 1952No. 34585PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBingaman, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff, Mildred E. McIntyre, against the defendant, Nevin J. Dieffenbach, seeking to recover rental paid, damages for repairs made upon a building leased by her from the defendant, and anticipated profits lost by her because of her removal from the building. The trial court submitted the cause to the jury as to the rental paid and cost of repairs, but refused to permit the introduction of evidence as to loss of anticipated profits. Defendant appeals from the judgment against him rendered on a verdict by the jury in favor of plaintiff, and plaintiff cross-appeals…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hannan v. DuschSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  2. Stewart v. MurphySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Holden v. TidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Dills v. CallowaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Flannagan v. DickersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rancho Pescado, Inc. v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. TK-7 Corp. v. Estate of BarboutiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  3. Ferrell v. ElrodCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1971
  4. Ccms Publishing Company, Inc. v. Dooley-Maloof, Inc. Raintree Communications, Inc. Charles J. Dooley, Individually and Thomas L. Maloof, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  5. Knier v. AZORES CONSTRUCTION COMPANYNevada Supreme Court · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API