Benzel v. Pitchford
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
In the trial of this action, the plaintiff, L. A. Pitchford, sought to recover a broker’s commission for the sale of real estate. There was no issue of fact or controversy as to the fact that defendant, Benzel, owned the real estate; that he listed it with plaintiff for sale, and that a sale was made to one Hoffman for $27,000. The plaintiff was entitled to a commission of 5 per cent, or $1,350, the sum sued for, if he was the procuring cause of the sale to Hoffman.
There was an issue of fact and a controversy as to whether the plaintiff, Pitchford, was the procuring cause of the sale, or, to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Page v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Thorp Oil & Specialty Co. v. Home Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Yukon Mills & Grain Co. v. Imperial Roller Mills Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Great Western Life Ins. Co. v. SparksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Maben v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Hair v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Rogers v. Citizens National Bank in OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Plummer v. FogleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Duke v. DukeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.