Legal Opinion

Benzel v. Pitchford

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 27, 1952No. 33718PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

In the trial of this action, the plaintiff, L. A. Pitchford, sought to recover a broker’s commission for the sale of real estate. There was no issue of fact or controversy as to the fact that defendant, Benzel, owned the real estate; that he listed it with plaintiff for sale, and that a sale was made to one Hoffman for $27,000. The plaintiff was entitled to a commission of 5 per cent, or $1,350, the sum sued for, if he was the procuring cause of the sale to Hoffman.

There was an issue of fact and a controversy as to whether the plaintiff, Pitchford, was the procuring cause of the sale, or, to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Page v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Thorp Oil & Specialty Co. v. Home Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Yukon Mills & Grain Co. v. Imperial Roller Mills Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Great Western Life Ins. Co. v. SparksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Maben v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. Hair v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. Rogers v. Citizens National Bank in OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  4. Plummer v. FogleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Duke v. DukeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API