Legal Opinion
Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. Daniel
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 12, 1965No. 40620PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALLEY, Chief Justice.
This is a proceeding in condemnation under the power of eminent domain brought by Oklahoma Turnpike Authority, as plaintiff, against Roy E. Daniel and Jessie Mae-Daniel, husband and wife, and The Bank of Tuttle, as defendants. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial' court.
On July 25, 1962, the plaintiff filed its petition in the District Court of McClain County, seeking to take for turnpike purposes a fee simple title to surface rights in-4.94 acres and a temporary right-of-way in-0.98 acres, from the northwest corner of the Daniels’ 140 acre farm…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Eberle v. State ex rel. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Champlin Refining Co. v. DonnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- City of Cushing v. PoteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Grooms v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. WeaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Root v. KAMO Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- COVEL v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- Lerma v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. BurkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- City of McAlester v. DelcielloSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.