Legal Opinion
Kunkel v. Rattray
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 12, 1924No. 14773PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PINKHAM. C.
The two above entitled cases were tried together in the trial court upon a stipulation that the evidence should be considered in both cases, but that separate verdicts should be rendered.
The cases will be referred to in this opinion as the “Rattray” case and the “Steyne” case.
The defendant in error E. I). Rattray was the plaintiff in the Rattray ease, and the defendant in error Allen N. Steyne was the plaintiff in the Steyne case. The plaintiff in error, John C. Kunkel, Jr., was the 1 defendant in both cases.
The parties will be designated as they appeared in the trial…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Home Insurance v. Baltimore Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Teasley v. BradleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. Wallace & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Thorp Oil & Specialty Co. v. Home Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Freeman v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Grooms v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Henry Building Company v. CowmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Plummer v. FogleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Payne v. McRay BrothersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.