Legal Opinion

State v. Huffstetler

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1984No. 329A83Published

1Opinion of the Court

322 S.E.2d 110 (1984)

312 N.C. 92

STATE of North Carolina

v.

David Earl HUFFSTETLER.

No. 329A83.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 6, 1984.

Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen. by Isaac T. Avery, III, Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State.

Robert W. Clark, Asst. Public Defender, Gastonia, for defendant-appellant.

MITCHELL, Justice.

The defendant was convicted of the first degree murder of Edna Cordell Powell and sentenced to death. He brings forward assignments of error relative to the guilt-innocence phase of his trial and the sentencing phase. Having considered with care the entire record and…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API