Legal Opinion

Bentex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Richardson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 23, 1972No. 71-1243PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSELL, Circuit Judge:

This appeal turns on a construction of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938, as amended in 1962.1 21 U.S.C. § 301 et seq. This statute requires premarketing approval and clearance of any “new drug” by the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare.2 The term “new drug” is defined as one “not generally recognized, among experts qualified by scientific training and experience to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of drugs, as safe and effective for use under the conditions prescribed, recommended, or suggested in the labeling thereof * * 3 From a denial of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. The Toilet Goods Association, Inc. v. John w.ga Rdner, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Toilet Goods Ass'n v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. 41 Cases, More or Less, Etc., Naremco, Inc., Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. British Caledonian Airways, Ltd. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. Articles of Drug . . . HormoninDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1980
  3. United States v. 789 Cases, More or LessDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1992
  4. United States v. an Article of Drug ... Neo-Terramycin Soluble Powder ConcentrateDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1982
  5. Agri-Tech, Inc. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API