Legal Opinion
United States v. 789 Cases, More or Less
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided August 20, 1992No. Civ. 90-1777 (JP)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PIERAS, District Judge.
This is an in rem forfeiture action brought by the plaintiff, United States of America (“plaintiff”), pursuant to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the “Act”), 21 U.S.C. § 301 et seq. The requisite Initial Scheduling Conference and Pretrial Conference were held, and a Non-Jury Trial was conducted on September 3 — 13, 1991; February 13 — 14, 1991; March 30— 31, 1991; and April 3, 1992.
Based on the evidence presented by the parties and after due deliberation, this Court now makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
FINDINGS OF…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,260 Lora Lohr, Michael Lohr, Her Husband v. Medtronic, Inc., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- In re Grand Jury SubpoenaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- Coyne Beahm, Inc. v. United States Food & Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1997
- Association of American, Physicians & Surgeons, Inc. v. United States Food & Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Nutritional Health Alliance v. Food And Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.