Legal Opinion

Agri-Tech, Inc. v. Richardson

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 2, 1973No. 72-1252PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATTHES, Senior Circuit Judge.

Agri-Tech, Inc. has petitioned this court to review an order of the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare issued through the Commissioner of Food and Drugs on February 24, 1972, withdrawing approval of New Animal Drug Applications (NADA) Nos. 5-987V and 5-633V, respectively, concerning drugs containing “iodinated casein,” or “Protamone,” as the active ingredient.1

On January 10, 1973, we heard arguments, and the cause was taken under submission. Two days prior thereto, January 8, 1973, the Supreme Court had granted certiorari in Bentex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Weinberger v. Bentex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Ciba Corp. v. WeinbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. The Upjohn Company v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare, and Herbert L. Ley, Jr., Commissioner of Food and DrugsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  5. USV Pharmaceutical Corp. v. WeinbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Animal Legal Defense Fund Boston, Inc. v. Provimi Veal Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1986
  2. United States v. 14 CASES, ETC.,(BAG)" NAREMCO MEDI-MATICDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1974
  3. Agri-Tech, Inc. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API