Legal Opinion
United States v. an Article of Drug ... Neo-Terramycin Soluble Powder Concentrate
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided May 6, 1982No. Civ. A. CA3-79-615-DPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROBERT M. HILL, District Judge.
Came on for consideration before the Court the motion for disposition under 21 CFR § 558.15 filed by Pfizer, Inc. (Pfizer), claimant, and the motion for summary judgment filed by the United States, plaintiff. Having considered the motions, briefs and oral argument of the parties, as well as the evidence submitted in support of the motions, the Court is of the opinion that the motion for disposition under 21 CFR § 558.-15 should be denied and that the motion for summary judgment should be granted.
The procedural posture of this action is set out in the…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. RutherfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. An Article of Drug Consisting of 4,680 Pails, More or Less, Each Pail Containing 60 Packets, Etc., Pfizer, Inc., Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Forest Guardians v. ThomasDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1997
- Washington Gas Energy Services, Inc. v. District of Columbia Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- United States v. Articles of DrugDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- Southern Timber Purchasers Council v. AlcockDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.