Legal Opinion

State v. Pickett

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1897PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson District Court.- — Hon. F. W. Eichelberger, Judge. At the February term, 1897, of said court, the defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted of the crime of adultery, and Ms motion for ai new trial overruled, and judgment of imprisonment in the penitentiary for the period of nine month® entered against Mm, ■from which he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGiven, J.

One ground of appellant’s motion for a new trial is that one of the jurors who sat on the trial cannot read or unite the English' language, and that appellant did not know that fact until after the trial. It is shown that one of the jurors, a native of Sweden, whO' had resided in this country for nineteen years, and become a citizen thereof, and an elector of this state, could not read or write the English language. Such 'being the fact, appellant contend® that the court erred in overruling his motion for a new trial. Section 1, chapter 61? Laws Twenty-sixth General Assembly, *716is as follows:…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  2. Hill v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  3. State v. TullerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1867
  4. People v. CoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Davison v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1878

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. MathesonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  3. State v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Commonwealth v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Kelli Jo Griffin v. Paul Pate, in His Official Capacities as the Secretary of State of Iowa, and Denise Fraise, in Her Official Capacities as the County Auditor of Lee County, IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API