Johnson v. Ford
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, District Judge.
The plaintiffs have here moved, pursuant to Rule 34, F.R.Civ.P., for the production of certain statements of witnesses which are alleged to be in the possession of defendants’ attorneys, but which were not taken by defendants’ attorneys, and which are under the control of the defendants. These statements, it appears from the admission of defendants’ counsel in open court, were made by witnesses to an accident occurring on July 29,1961 at the Cherokee Dude Ranch in which Rita Johnson was injured. It is not contended that the statements were made to defendants’ attorneys…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- De Bruce v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
- Crowe v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1961
- Dennhardt v. HolmanDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1951
3Cited by16 opinions
- Southern Railway Company v. Carl Talmadge LanhamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. McAlpineSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
- Carman v. FishelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Jackson v. Kroblin Refrigerated Xpress, Inc.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1970
- United States v. GatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.