Legal Opinion
Dennhardt v. Holman
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided November 9, 1951No. Civ. A. No. 3487PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNOUS, District Judge.
The plaintiff instituted this action against Louis Holman and others to recover damages for injuries which were allegedly sustained by her in an automobile accident.
The plaintiff has filed a motion under Rule 34, Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C.A., for the production and inspection of a certain accident report heretofore made by the defendant Holman and presently in the hands of his attorneys.
It appears from the motion that Holman was insured by the General Accident Assurance Corporation. The terms of his policy required him to prepare and submit an accident report to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gordon v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- Price v. LevittDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1939
- Bough v. LeeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Simper v. TrimbleDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1949
- Colpak v. HetterickDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cain v. BarkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Johnson v. FordDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1964
- Heidebrink v. MoriwakiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Cain v. BarkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976